Mon premier blog

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement by John Rawls

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement John Rawls ebook
ISBN: 0674005112, 9780674005112
Page: 240
Format: djvu
Publisher: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

He concludes that that only two of these five regimes could, in principle, realize justice. Procedural justice is considerably the easier to deal with, Involving as it does, relatively technical questions such as due process, fair trial and equality before the law. JF Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Taking back/reworking aspects of A Theory of Justice, I.e. Inserting public reason/overlapping consensus stuff while removing the Kantian basis of Justice as Fairness, in Political Liberalism/Justice As Fairness: Restatement. Shaw, Barry, and Sansbury (2009) identify justice as fairness which is attributed to the fair treatment to a number of groups of people. It is a fundamental rule pertaining on how to organize the society. In Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Rawls evaluates five types of regimes. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001). Otherwise, unequal rights and liberties undermine democratic Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. In time the lectures became a restatement of his theory of justice as fairness, revised in light of his more recent papers and his treatise Political Liberalism (1993). In Justice as Fairness, Rawls asserts that the basic or fundamental rights of “conscience and freedom of association, freedom of speech (my emphasis) and liberty of the person, the rights to vote, to hold public office, to be treated in accordance with the rule of law, and so on,” should be equal to all” as a matter of justice. Perhaps the most telling point for the outcome of Rawl's “practical utopia” is found in 2001 book “Justice as Fairness: A Restatement” 18.3, p.64, he allows for the possibility where real capital accumulation stops, i.e. Ȁ�本次的文獻，同樣地也是參考John Rawls的「Justice as Fairness: A Restatement」。 正義二原則面對的問題[1]： 1. [6] This feature of Theory becomes more pronounced in Political Liberalism where Rawls presents Justice as Fairness as a way of specifying the content of a political conception of justice, understood as a module that can fit into and claim support from any reasonable comprehensive doctrine.[7]. Still, it is to some extent already present in the earlier work. Justice as Fairness is a concise, self-contained, and up to date presentation of Rawls' views.